Flip a coin
One tap, a genuine even chance, and a running tally so you can watch how streaky fair really looks.
Fairer than an actual coin
A physical coin is not a perfect randomiser. Its mass is not evenly distributed, which introduces a small bias, and the way it is caught matters — research on coin flipping has found a measurable tendency to land the same way up as it started when caught in the hand. Spinning a coin on a table is worse again, sometimes substantially so.
A cryptographic random bit has none of those physical asymmetries. What it lacks is the thing that makes a real coin useful in an argument: everybody can watch a real coin.
Fair looks streaky
The tally is here because the most common misunderstanding about randomness is what it should look like. Over a hundred fair flips, a run of six or more identical results is more likely than not. People asked to invent a "random-looking" sequence alternate far too much, and a coin flipper that felt right to that intuition would have to be rigged.
Watch the tally over fifty flips. It wanders, and it converges on even far more slowly than expected — the absolute gap between heads and tails tends to grow even as the ratio settles toward one.